When gears chip within days, it’s almost never normal wear — it’s a supplier capability failure. Most shops blame material or heat treatment, but fast chipping usually comes from machining-induced micro-cracks, poor fixturing, or missed geometry checks.
Gears chip early when tooth edges are weakened during machining or finishing, or when the supplier cannot hold geometry under load. Material defects are the rare exception.
This post shows how to pinpoint the real cause, what to verify on your drawing immediately, and how to choose a replacement supplier that won’t repeat the failure — and if you need a second opinion now, you can upload your drawing as you read on.
Table of Contents
How do you tell if chipping came from material failure or machining defects?
You can tell the difference by where the cracks start: machining defects create localized edge fractures, while true material failures show uniform breakage across the batch. When chips appear only on certain teeth or radii, it almost always points to tool wear, poor deburring, or finishing stresses — not bad steel.
Most suppliers can’t distinguish the two because they don’t run hardness mapping, edge-integrity checks, or surface-crack inspection. When they lack this data, they guess — usually blaming the material. We look at fracture patterns, heat-affected zones, and tooth-edge condition to confirm whether the failure was baked in during machining.
Failure Insight: Before you re-order more gears from the same supplier, it’s worth letting someone examine a photo or the drawing — early micro-crack signatures are easy to spot, and catching them now prevents paying for another batch that fails the same way.
What should you check on your drawing first when parts chip early?
Start by checking whether your drawing clearly defines edge-break requirements, root radii, tooth-profile tolerances, and finish specifications — because these features most often drive early chipping. If any of these callouts are vague or missing, the supplier will fill gaps with their own defaults, especially during quoting.
Rushed shops often assume generic chamfers or inconsistent deburring, and tooth edges can’t survive real loading when those assumptions are wrong. We regularly review drawings where a missing radius, an ambiguous burr limit, or an undefined post-treat check was the reason a batch chipped within days.
Sourcing Insight: If you’re unsure whether your drawing allowed too much interpretation, share it for a quick look — it’s usually obvious within minutes whether the failure came from missing specs or from the way your supplier machined the part.
What red flags show a supplier misunderstood your gear requirements?
The biggest warning sign is when a supplier quotes quickly but never asks how the gear is loaded or how the edges should be protected — gears can’t be priced or machined correctly without that context. A shop that only looks at the 2D drawing often misses the functional details that decide whether a tooth survives or chips.
Another red flag is silence around risk points. If a supplier never questioned a tight profile tolerance, coating thickness, or edge break, it usually means they didn’t notice them. When a shop “agrees” too easily, what they’re actually doing is hoping the geometry is simple enough to survive their process.
We see this pattern often: the quote looks confident, but the failure shows the shop never understood what mattered. If all communication from them was generic — “Yes, we can do it” — without mentioning fixturing, finishing, or inspection, they were never aligned with your requirements.
Sourcing Insight: If you look back at their emails and realize they never engaged with the difficult features, it’s a strong indication the quoting process wasn’t real. Before committing to another batch, you can forward the drawing — reviewing the overlooked risk points doesn’t take long and prevents a second failure.
Not Sure Why Your Gears Failed?
Upload your drawing — we’ll pinpoint the real cause before you reorder
How do you determine if supplier's fixturing caused uneven loading and gear failure?
Uneven fixturing leaves a very specific signature: chipping concentrated on the same sector of the gear instead of evenly around the circumference. If the fractures repeat in one arc, it almost always means the blank was distorted or poorly supported during machining.
Suppliers using generic vises or improvised fixtures often introduce runout they never measure. That distortion changes how the tooth enters load during service, and even a small misalignment can drive chipping. If your supplier can’t show how the gear was located, how many clamps were used, or whether they checked runout after setup, fixturing likely played a major role.
We look at tooth contact, runout trends, and toolpath transitions to confirm whether the stress pattern matches fixturing-induced deformation. This is one of the fastest root causes to identify — the failure pattern nearly always repeats in the same angular band.
Failure Insight: If your failed gear shows a “cluster” of chipped teeth in one region, a quick photo is usually enough to tell whether fixturing was at fault. It’s better to confirm this now than remake parts that will fail in the exact same place again.
What inspection data must your supplier provide after a chipping failure?
You need inspection data that proves they actually checked the features tied to chipping — edge condition, tooth profile error, hardness, runout, and surface finish. A report that only lists a few basic dimensions can’t explain why a gear failed, and it usually means those checks were never performed.
When inspection is missing, the supplier can’t separate machining defects from heat-treat distortion or coating issues. You should expect to see tooth-profile plots, before-/after-treat measurements, edge break verification, and finish readings near the chipped region. Without those, any explanation they give is speculation.
We routinely review reports where the critical points are simply not there — not because the shop hid them, but because they didn’t have the equipment to measure them. When the essential data is missing, the failure was almost guaranteed.
Sourcing Insight: If the report you received feels “thin,” send it over. It only takes a short review to see whether the supplier ever had enough inspection control to protect your gear, and catching that now prevents repeating the same failure cycle.
When does geometry nonconformance justify stopping production?
You should stop production as soon as the supplier shows repeating profile or lead errors across multiple parts — that pattern almost always means they lack the tooling, fixturing, or inspection to bring the part back into tolerance. Once geometry drifts in a consistent direction, it won’t magically improve in later batches.
Many shops keep running parts hoping “the next setup will be better,” but gears don’t behave that way. If they can’t control profile error on the first few pieces, the underlying cause — tool deflection, weak fixturing, thermal drift, or incorrect offsets — won’t disappear mid-run. Continuing production only multiplies scrap and delays.
We see this often: a supplier sends a handful of borderline parts and promises the rest will be “tuned in.” If they didn’t adjust the process after the first miss, they likely don’t know how.
Sourcing Insight: If your inspection data shows repeating geometry faults, pausing now saves more time than letting them finish the batch. Sharing a few measurement points is usually enough for us to confirm whether the issue is recoverable or if switching suppliers is the safer path.
Should you remake as-is, adjust specs, or switch suppliers after repeated chipping?
If chipping happens in multiple batches, the safest option is to switch suppliers, because repeating the job with the same process almost always produces the same failure. Adjusting specs is only appropriate when the drawing clearly left too much room for interpretation; otherwise, the machining process — not the design — is the weak point.
Shops sometimes suggest relaxing tolerances or widening radii, but that recommendation often masks a capability gap. If three suppliers can hit the spec and one cannot, the issue isn’t the design. And if the current shop can’t explain the failure with data, changing specs won’t make their process more stable.
We routinely help customers decide whether redesign is warranted. Most of the time, the drawing is fine — the execution wasn’t. And remaking parts under the same conditions is exactly how chipping becomes a recurring budget leak.
Decision Insight: If you’re doubting whether to adjust the spec or walk away, a quick review of the drawing and failure pattern usually shows the answer. Sending the file over early saves days of uncertainty and another round of scrap.
What capability proofs should a new supplier provide to prevent repeat chipping?
A capable supplier should show evidence of how they control edge integrity, tooth geometry, heat-treat distortion, and finishing stress — without these proof points, you risk repeating the same failure. Anyone can claim they “can machine gears”; only a few can demonstrate how they keep tooth edges from failing in real service.
Examples that matter:
– showing CMM plots instead of generic inspection sheets
– explaining their fixturing approach for thin or high-ratio gears
– referencing how they protect edges during finishing
– providing before-/after-treat measurements
These details reveal whether the shop has a stable, repeatable process or just hopes the part survives.
You don’t need a long audit — just enough proof to show the shop understands the stress points in your design and has the equipment to measure what matters.
Sourcing Insight: If you’re evaluating a replacement supplier, feel free to send the drawing over. It’s easy to tell within a short review whether the shop will control the variables that caused your last batch to chip.
How do you diagnose if surface finish or coating caused chipping and prevent it?
If the chipping originates from the tooth edge outward, and the fracture lines follow the coating or finish boundary, the failure often ties back to the finishing step. Over-aggressive blasting, uneven coating buildup, or polishing that thins the edge can all leave the tooth too fragile for real loading.
You can usually see the clues in how the chip forms. Coating-related failures break cleanly along a surface layer, while machining cracks tend to originate deeper below the coating. When the supplier can’t provide finish readings or pre-/post-coating measurements, it becomes difficult to separate cosmetic work from structural damage.
During failure reviews, we look at whether the finish introduced stress rather than reducing it. Even a well-machined gear can fail early if the finishing step wasn’t controlled tightly.
Failure Insight: If you still have the failed part, a close photo of the chipped region often hints at whether the coating played a role — and knowing that early helps you avoid repeating the issue on the next batch.
What questions expose whether your supplier inspected parts before shipping?
The simplest test is asking for the exact data they used to release the parts — if they can’t produce it, they likely didn’t inspect what mattered. Many shops rely on a quick visual check, especially when running behind schedule, and chipped gears are often the result of missing measurements.
Good suppliers can explain how they verified profile, lead, edge condition, and hardness. When a shop struggles to describe their inspection sequence — or provides numbers that don’t match the drawing — it usually means the inspection was incomplete or skipped entirely.
We frequently see situations where the printed report looks fine, but key values are missing because those checks were never done. Inconsistent or vague inspection notes often tell the whole story.
Sourcing Insight: If your supplier hesitates when you ask how they confirmed edge integrity or profile accuracy, that hesitation is meaningful. A quick look at their report can usually reveal what was actually inspected — and what wasn’t.
Worried a New Supplier Will Fail Again?
Send your drawing for a quick capability check before approving a remake.
How do you vet replacement suppliers fast to avoid a second chipping failure?
Look for suppliers who can explain, in plain terms, how they control the four causes of chipping: edge integrity, tooth geometry, heat-treat distortion, and finishing stress. When a shop understands these risks, they can tell you exactly how they keep them in check — not just claim they can meet the drawing.
You don’t need a long audit. The real signal is how quickly the supplier identifies the risk points in your part. If they can point out where failures typically start, how they’d fixture the gear, and what they’d measure before shipping, you’re dealing with a shop that has built the process intentionally.
When evaluating a new vendor, engineers often find that the most telling moment is simply the first conversation — whether the supplier talks about machining sequences and inspection or just promises they can “match the spec.”
Sourcing Insight: If you want a second opinion on whether a new shop seems capable, you can share the drawing details you’re evaluating; it’s usually obvious which vendors understand the failure modes and which ones are guessing.
Conclusion
Early gear chipping rarely comes from the design itself — it comes from processes your supplier didn’t control. Identifying the real cause early prevents repeating the same failure, lost weeks, and unnecessary rework. A clear review of geometry, finishing, and inspection stability is the fastest way to recover your project.
Frequently Asked Questions
If crack patterns show machining or finishing stress, the failure was preventable. Material-related failures are far less common.
Only if the drawing clearly lacked edge, radius, or finish definitions. Most chipping comes from process instability, not design errors.
If they didn’t explain the failure with data — not guesses — the remake often repeats the same issue, which extends delays.
Usually very quickly. Failure patterns, missing inspection points, and geometry trends reveal root cause far faster than most buyers expect.
Because machining, heat-treat, and finishing variables matter as much as the drawing. If any of these weren’t controlled, the gear can fail despite perfect specs.
Yes. Uneven quenching or distortion can overload certain teeth, even when hardness values meet spec.
